Market Turmoil

February 28th, 2008 by john

Credit fallout leads to turmoil 

After an eventful end to 2007, investors are looking at 2008 with apprehension. The last few months have seen the collapse of the

US sub-prime mortgage market, the credit crunch, and the first “run” on a UK bank for over a century. Speculation over the possible length and severity of the fallout from the credit crunch continues to dominate headlines. Meanwhile, fears of an economic slowdown in the US, coupled with soaring food and energy bills, have compounded the pervading atmosphere of nervousness. 

For companies, the credit crunch has led to a sharp increase in the cost of borrowing. Although many companies are in relatively strong financial shape, some – particularly smaller companies – may find tighter credit conditions hard. This could ultimately lead to job losses and higher unemployment figures. On the consumer side, a booming housing market had fuelled confidence, giving UK homeowners, in hindsight, an over-inflated sense of wealth. This, coupled with the availability of easy credit, encouraged many to borrow large sums of money. However, the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage market has stopped the easily available credit and consumers are more wary about their spending. For many UK retailers, the Christmas boom failed to materialise, resulting in downbeat reports and even profits warnings. 

This has sent a worrying signal to those already concerned about prospects for economic growth. Sentiment amongst equity investors has taken a further knock. Nevertheless, the corporate environment remains in relatively good shape: it is possible to find well-managed companies with strong balance sheets. However, selectivity and realistic expectations are important during this time of uncertainty. 

Looking ahead, investor sentiment is likely to remain fragile and bad news will likely meet with a disproportionate level of disappointment. Investors have good reason to be wary in the short term; however, stock markets tend to be driven not by logic, but by emotional factors such as fear: the key is to stay calm, think long term, and be selective. Astute long-term investors should remain objective and remember that, in the words of Franklin D Roosevelt, “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself”.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in Investing your money, General | No Comments »

Do you have an Abbey Life policy?

July 31st, 2007 by andrew

UK bank Lloyds TSB has announced it is selling its Abbey Life insurance business for £977m to Deutsche Bank. Abbey Life is a subsidiary of Lloyds’ Scottish Widows unit and has been closed to new business since 2000.

Lloyds TSB concluded that the sale of Abbey Life was in the “best interest of the group, as well as Abbey Life’s policyholders and staff”.

As of 31 December 2006, Abbey Life managed £12bn of assets held in 1.2 million policies, do you own one of the policies? It will be interesting to see what if any benefit there will be for policyholders. If you would like us to review your Abbey Life plan in view of this announcement then please contact us.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in Investing your money, Retirement and beyond, General | No Comments »

A Bonus for State Pension Income

July 23rd, 2007 by andrew

State pensions (particularly womens) have been given a boost with a proposed change to the rules regarding voluntary National Insurance contributions.

Currently there is a six year time limit on paying these contributions. This means that if you did not pay National Insurance in a tax year you are not entitled to any extra state pension income for that tax year, unless you pay voluntary National Insurance within the next six tax years.

Generally speaking though it is not until State Pension Age that people really look at what they are entitled to, by which time it can be long since the tax years that National Insurance was unpaid with no way of making this up. Bearing in mind what good value the State Pension is for most people, this means a lot of people are missing out on a good way to top up their retirement income.

The new Pensions Bill is going to allow people to defer the decision until their own State Pension Age and allow people to buy up to nine years. This will give everyone a great opportunity to top up this pension when they are at a time when they are more likely to have the funds to pay the voluntary contributions. The big winners will be women, currently only 25% of women have a full State Pension compared to 90% of men.

The government may try to overturn the decision but the recent defeat in the House of Lords will make this more difficult.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in Investing your money, Retirement and beyond, General | No Comments »

Property pendulum?

July 13th, 2007 by john

For years, the UK property market has been on a phenomenal run, outstripping inflation by a significant amount. The upshot is that young people can no longer get on to the housing ladder and it is reported that average property prices now exceed five times national income. But is this a one way bet? Why are prices rising? The answer is that property prices will rise until the costs of servicing the debt consume such a proportion of income that prices can rise no further. So if interest rates are low properties seem cheap because they consume a smaller proportion of income. Interest rates are now standing at 5.75%. Within living memory of anybody over the age of about 30 interest rates have been at 12% or more and it looks like interest rates are gently moving upwards while inflation is potentially reappearing.   Much of the reason for no inflation recently has been the phenomenal growth in

China where cheap manufacturing is providing us with cheap goods at ever-reducing prices masking local inflation. Eventually this has to stop as

China will become increasingly wealthy. Its citizens will be paid more , while material prices will rise and the disinflationary effect must stop. At this point surely global interest rates will start to rise as governments seeks to choke off real inflation. As interest rates rise and the cost of servicing debts reaches a point where buy-to-let investors are losing money (which they are already) and house holders can no longer afford their own mortgages, property prices must fall. There are other forces afoot. How many people do you hear saying that their buy-to-let property is their pension. Well that is a great idea all the time that you are fit and able to go round and collect your rent but what happens when you are in your 80’s and you have to collect your rent from some character who can’t pay you? What will you do? Well if you have any sense you will sell the property long before you get to such a point. So if the baby boom generation begin to sell their properties at the same time surely property prices ( at least in the buy-to-let market) will fall and if they fall what happens to all those people who strapped themselves to the hilt to get in, in the first place. Surely this is not a question of if but when.  Let’s see.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in General | No Comments »

A new “depolarisation”?

June 30th, 2007 by john

The FSA’s long awaited Retail Distribution Review put the cat among the pigeons this week. By 2009, the market may be split into two camps – with only those advisers holding the Diploma in Financial Planning being allowed to practise in complex areas. Given that only about 6% of advisers are thought to hold this diploma, (which last week was classified as being a degree equivalent), we should see the market polarise in an entirely new way. Those who have bothered to study their subject rather than try to make a quick buck off what is no more than an O level will see their efforts rewarded, while the cowboys should be driven out. Interestingly this development is announced within a fortnight of the FSA’s admission that depolarising the market and forcing advance disclosure of status and costs had failed completely to eliminate commission bias or push the market towards fees. Finally the penny has dropped – consumers have little confidence in financial advisers because it’s just too easy to become one. Independent, tied, multi-tied or whole of market is irrelevant – what matters to consumers is that the adviser actually has a clue about investment strategy, tax, trusts, risk management and so on. Roll on 2009!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Posted in General | No Comments »

Next Entries »